Understanding Michigan's Marijuana Tax Dispute

The state of Michigan has become a focal point for cannabis tax policy as it seeks to implement a 24% wholesale marijuana tax, now challenged as unconstitutional. As the case unfolds in the courts, its implications are being closely watched nationwide, highlighting not only its impact on cannabis pricing but also potential shifts in voter-approved legislation and taxation methodologies across the U.S.

Whether you are a cannabis consumer or reside outside Michigan, this ruling holds significance. The decision could influence how other states formulate, revise, and uphold cannabis-related taxes, offering insights into potential future legal conflicts as the cannabis market expands.

Here’s the essential information for Americans to consider.

Details of Michigan's Proposal

As part of the 2025–2026 fiscal budget, Michigan legislators sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at financing road infrastructure projects. This levy targets transactions earlier in the cannabis supply chain, apparent before products reach retailer shelves.

Currently, Michigan enforces two other cannabis taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail marijuana sales, endorsed by voters in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax.

Should the new wholesale tax be enacted, it will establish one of the most extensive cannabis tax frameworks in the country.

Image 1

Reasons Behind the Industry Lawsuit

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has filed a lawsuit claiming the new tax is unconstitutional. Their argument hinges on the central assertion:

Any amendments to the 2018 voter-endorsed marijuana legislation require a supermajority vote.

When residents approved recreational cannabis under the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), the act became safeguarded. Any legislative amendments necessitate a three-fourths supermajority, a threshold not reached when lawmakers passed the wholesale tax by simple majority.

MCIA representative, Rose Tantraphol, highlighted the importance of this case, stating, “As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry representatives caution the tax could exacerbate costs, strain small enterprises, and possibly divert consumers to unregulated alternatives, a trend observed in high-tax areas such as California.

Ready to leap?
Our team is standing by to help!
Reach out now

Image 3

The State's Defense

State officials contend the legality of the tax based on these arguments:

  • The wholesale tax is a new imposition, separate from the 2018 voter-approved cannabis statute

  • The authority of the legislature to enact taxes for fiscal needs

  • The tax's intent is to fund road infrastructure, not modify cannabis policy

Should the courts concur, the tax may be implemented on January 1, 2026.

Potential Consumer Impacts

This case is pivotal even for Americans distant from Michigan, as the tax setup for cannabis could spark trends in other states. If the tax withstands legal challenges:

  • Wholesale prices are likely to escalate

  • Retail prices could rise in response

  • Some consumers might resort to lower-cost illicit markets

  • Smaller businesses might confront increased pressures or consolidation

If nullified, Michigan’s extant tax system—already competitive at national pricing—will persist unaltered.

Why This Case Holds National Significance

Although this legal battle plays out in Michigan, its repercussions extend beyond state boundaries.

1. Testing the Strength of Voter-Approved Statutes

Should legislatures impose taxes sans supermajority consent, it could alter the dynamics of ballot initiatives nationwide.

2. Influence on Other States' Cannabis Tax Formulations

States grappling with budgetary shortfalls might consider analogous taxes contingent on Michigan's precedent.

3. Ongoing National Disparities in Cannabis Taxes

In states like Oregon and Michigan, taxes remain comparatively moderate, enabling competitive legal products, unlike California thwarting thriving illegal markets.

Michigan’s lawsuit has the potential to serve as a template for how tax disputes are managed in other jurisdictions.

Anticipated Developments

Recent proceedings in the Michigan Court of Claims have progressed to the initial argument hearing and a ruling is expected soon. This dispute could platform up to the Michigan Supreme Court.
The resolution of this case will undeniably affect not just Michigan’s cannabis commerce, but also provide a framework for how states handle voter legislation, burgeoning sectors, and fiscal imperatives.

Ready to leap?
Our team is standing by to help!
Reach out now
Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .